BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//jEvents 2.0 for Joomla//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251026T020000
RDATE:20260329T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20261025T020000
RDATE:20270328T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20271031T020000
RDATE:20280326T030000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CET
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250423T090000
RDATE:20251026T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20260329T030000
RDATE:20261025T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20270328T030000
RDATE:20271031T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:Europe/Paris CEST
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:d497119f72c84478f370179e9f2314e7
CATEGORIES:Journées d’étude, Séminaire du CREM
CREATED:20260118T143744
SUMMARY:World Amplification International Study Day
LOCATION:MSH Mondes (bât. Weber)\, salle 2 (RDC) - 200 avenue de la République\, Nan
 terre\, \, 92000\, 
DESCRIPTION:<p><img src="images/pprouteau/547285538_24374747385479844_88548368646224388
 16_n.jpg" alt="547285538_24374747385479844_8854836864622438816_n.jpg" style
 ="margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; float: left;" width="2048" heigh
 t="1152" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Organized by Pierre Prouteau (LAMC &
 amp; EASt/ULB, CREM, CASE)</strong></p><p><span lang="en-US">Does the sound
  of the world tend to become always more amplified? Why does this feeling s
 tays on the mind like an earworm, sometimes with delight, often with a nega
 tive value attached to it – the nuisance of noise. How has this potentially
  universal tendency to enhance amplification been reinvigorated by electroa
 coustic? The objective of this study day is to address electroacoustic ampl
 ification in its physiological, acoustic, aesthetic, philosophical, technic
 al, moral dimensions—is the pleasure of some, the noise of others, and how 
 is the occupied “volume” negotiated? And its afferent political dimension. 
 The idea is to examine the definitions of sound intensity, its effects on a
 udience perception, and how electroacoustic amplification has impacted alre
 ady-existing repertoires, and contributed to create new ones. Can sound sys
 tems be a weapon in the media arena? As a weapon of the weak or an instrume
 nt of domination?</span></p><h2>Program</h2><p>9h30-10h Coffee</p><h3>I. Mu
 sicians and amplification</h3><p>10h-10h30 Abderraouf Ouertani (<span lang=
 "en-US"><span>member CUNTIC, Univ. of Tunis)</span></span> What amplificati
 on requires: The Impact of Amplification on Oud Practices (and its study)</
 p><p>10h30-11h Sarah Benhaim (Lecturer Univ. of Lorraine) Extreme listening
 : sounds and amplification in noise music</p><p>11h-11h30 Coffee</p><h3>II.
 &nbsp;Theories and measures of amplification (1)</h3><p>11h30-12h&nbsp;Muku
 l Menon (predoc, Univ. Tübingen) Modulating Religiosity: Qualified Amplific
 ation of Sounds, Ideas, and Practices&nbsp;</p><p><span style="background-c
 olor: inherit; color: inherit; font-family: inherit; font-size: 1rem; caret
 -color: auto;">12h-12h30&nbsp;Helma Korzybska (S2HEP, Univ. Lyon 1, member 
 LESC/CNRS, Univ. Paris Nanterre) Redefining “noise”. Amplifications, modula
 tions and redefinitions of auditory perception through cochlear implants</s
 pan></p><p>12h30-14h Lunch Break</p><h3>II. Theories and measures of amplif
 ication (2)</h3><p>14h-14h30&nbsp;Carola Lorea (Professor Univ. of Tübingen
 ) On mantras, picnic parties and car horns: towards a South Asian sonic the
 ory of amplification as auspiciousness</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Conclusiv
 e remarks</strong></p><p><span lang="en-US">14h30-15h Pierre Prouteau (LAMC
 , EASt/ULB, CREM, CASE) What is an "amplified society" ?</span></p><p>15h-1
 6h Collective discussion and end of study day</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Abstracts
 </h2><p><strong>Abderraouf Ouertani (<span lang="en-US">member CUNTIC, Univ
 . of Tunis)</span> What amplification requires: The impact of amplification
  on oud practices (and its study)</strong></p><p>This presentation will des
 cribe the impact of the widespread use of electric amplification in the cas
 e of the oud, between constraints (sound degradation, feedback) and advanta
 ges (new sounds, going beyond the strict framework of chamber music). It wi
 ll also be an opportunity to discuss the place of socio-technical phenomena
  related to electric amplification in music studies and to problematise som
 e key concepts in ethnomusicology such as ‘instrument’, “music” and ‘musici
 an’.</p><p><strong>Sarah Benhaim (Lecturer Univ. of Lorraine) Extreme liste
 ning: sounds and amplification in noise music</strong></p><p>Considering lo
 ud sound objects in the field of music invites us to take an interest in th
 e technical means and technologies used to amplify musical productions, but
  also in musical genres that place particular importance on sound volume in
  their creative process and listening modalities. This is the case with noi
 se music, an experimental music that emerged in the early 1980s, which is u
 nique in that it is characterised by noise-based material and sound diffusi
 on conditions that are often considered extreme. I will examine how noise a
 rtists and listeners perceive noise and high-volume amplification aesthetic
 ally and sensorially, based on interviews and recordings from a field study
  conducted in Paris. After a brief review of the centrality of noise in noi
 se music, I will explain how amplification constitutes a noisy mediation fr
 om the point of view of instrumental performance, before showing how it pla
 ys a major role in live listening by promoting an immersive and ecstatic li
 stening experience.</p><p><strong>Mukul Menon (predoc, Univ. Tübingen) Modu
 lating Religiosity: Qualified Amplification of Sounds, Ideas, and Practices
 </strong></p><p>Sound in the context of public, communal, and private piety
  is linked to mediation with the more-than-human and the inscription of ide
 ntity, social relations, and associations with the past. Amplification as a
  tool and a method of augmenting such processes is especially evident in re
 ligious cultures that are based on what has been termed ‘acoustic piety’, t
 hat is, religiosity significantly produced, interpreted, and perceived thro
 ugh sound and in sonic terms. What do differences in sonic and cultural amp
 lification of religious practices in a hierarchical and stratified social e
 nvironment indicate about underlying social phenomena? To explore this idea
 , this paper takes as a case study the popular practice of recitations of t
 he 16th-century text, <em>Addhyātma</em> <em>Rāmāyaṇam</em> <em>Kiḷippāṭṭ,<
 /em> a regional vernacular retelling of the religious epic <em>Rāmāyaṇa </e
 m>in Kerala, South India. Using ethnographic and archival data, it looks at
  how, through the amplification of recitational practices and ancillary act
 ivities- including onsite live and playback performances, congregational so
 nic acts, public sermons, and political speeches in urban and rural context
 s- particular communities, socialities, and spaces are delineated. Modulati
 ons in how ideas and sounds are expanded indicate particularities of cultur
 al transformations and continuities. which are expressed, shared, and felt,
  but also creatively deployed by social agents.</p><p><strong>Helma Korzybs
 ka (S2HEP, Univ. Lyon 1, member LESC/CNRS, Univ. Paris Nanterre) Redefining
  “noise”. Amplifications, modulations and redefinitions of auditory percept
 ion through cochlear implants</strong></p><p>Introducing neurotechnologies 
 into the bodies and perception of people who have lost the ability to hear 
 raises numerous technical, cultural and ethical questions (Mills 2012, Frie
 dner and Helmreich 2012, Lloyd &amp; Bonventre 2020, Bonventre et al. 2023,
  Kecman et al. 2026), nuancing widespread notions of human augmentation. Th
 e learning and rehabilitation process following the surgical implantation i
 s long and strenuous, leaving people with sounding worlds they often find d
 ifficult to interpret and to incorporate. Not only do individuals have to d
 eal with day-to-day technical issues and sensory fluctuations, but they als
 o must learn to manage the cultural gap with the newfound perception.</p><p
 >Using cochlear implants requires different types of adjustments and negoti
 ations, of sensory thresholds, somatic modes of attention, as well as expec
 tations… If “augmenting” perception doesn’t usually translate in a meliorat
 ive sense, some kind of enhancement does operate here. What kinds of amplif
 ications or intensifications are produced or enabled through these stimulat
 ion devices? How are perception and experience amplified in this context?</
 p><p>The technological design and implantation and rehabilitation protocols
  lead to very specific ways of heightening sensations and modes of attentio
 n. This communication proposes to offer insights into the complexity of equ
 ipping perception with technological devices, by focusing on the semantic, 
 sensory, and affective redefinitions of “noise”, as revealed through the el
 ectrode calibration process and negotiations between patients and speech th
 erapists/audiologists observed in a cochlear implantation service in France
 .</p><p><strong><span lang="en-US">Dr. Carola Lorea (Professor Univ. of Tüb
 ingen) On mantras, picnic parties and car horns: towards a South Asian soni
 c theory of amplification as auspiciousness</span></strong></p><p><span lan
 g="en-US">Based on extensive ethnographic research on mantras and sacred so
 und practices in India, this paper develops a preliminary theory of amplifi
 cation as auspiciousness. Drawing on sonic ethnography, I approach amplific
 ation not primarily as a technical operation, but as a culturally and ritua
 lly charged modality of sharing auspiciousness in space. I first demonstrat
 e how amplified sound is widely associated with safety, joy, the assertion 
 of presence, life energy, and positive force. Through everyday and festive 
 soundscapes—such as picnic-season loudspeaker cultures and the affective se
 nsorium of vehicular honking—I show how loudness and sonic expansion are so
 cially experienced as protective, enlivening, and affirming.</span></p><p><
 span lang="en-US">The paper then moves beyond strictly audible sound to exp
 lore forms of non-electroacoustic amplification of unheard auspicious sound
 s. Focusing in particular on spinning and other kinetic practices, I examin
 e how motion itself amplifies mantras—understood as sacred, efficacious for
 mulas—by engaging agentive elements such as wind, fire, electricity, and th
 e human voice. Here, amplification is not only a matter of volume, but of c
 irculation, repetition, and scattering into space, underscoring the insepar
 ability of sound, movement, space, and felt vibration. By bringing together
  loudness, motion, and mantra practice, this paper traces the contours of a
  broader South Asian sonic ideology in which amplification emerges as a cen
 tral mode of producing auspiciousness and of making place.</span></p>
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p><img src="https://mail.lesc-cnrs.fr/images/pprouteau/547285538_243747473
 85479844_8854836864622438816_n.jpg" alt="547285538_24374747385479844_885483
 6864622438816_n.jpg" style="margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; float:
  left;" width="2048" height="1152" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><strong>Organized 
 by Pierre Prouteau (LAMC &amp; EASt/ULB, CREM, CASE)</strong></p><p><span l
 ang="en-US">Does the sound of the world tend to become always more amplifie
 d? Why does this feeling stays on the mind like an earworm, sometimes with 
 delight, often with a negative value attached to it – the nuisance of noise
 . How has this potentially universal tendency to enhance amplification been
  reinvigorated by electroacoustic? The objective of this study day is to ad
 dress electroacoustic amplification in its physiological, acoustic, aesthet
 ic, philosophical, technical, moral dimensions—is the pleasure of some, the
  noise of others, and how is the occupied “volume” negotiated? And its affe
 rent political dimension. The idea is to examine the definitions of sound i
 ntensity, its effects on audience perception, and how electroacoustic ampli
 fication has impacted already-existing repertoires, and contributed to crea
 te new ones. Can sound systems be a weapon in the media arena? As a weapon 
 of the weak or an instrument of domination?</span></p><h2>Program</h2><p>9h
 30-10h Coffee</p><h3>I. Musicians and amplification</h3><p>10h-10h30 Abderr
 aouf Ouertani (<span lang="en-US"><span>member CUNTIC, Univ. of Tunis)</spa
 n></span> What amplification requires: The Impact of Amplification on Oud P
 ractices (and its study)</p><p>10h30-11h Sarah Benhaim (Lecturer Univ. of L
 orraine) Extreme listening: sounds and amplification in noise music</p><p>1
 1h-11h30 Coffee</p><h3>II.&nbsp;Theories and measures of amplification (1)<
 /h3><p>11h30-12h&nbsp;Mukul Menon (predoc, Univ. Tübingen) Modulating Relig
 iosity: Qualified Amplification of Sounds, Ideas, and Practices&nbsp;</p><p
 ><span style="background-color: inherit; color: inherit; font-family: inher
 it; font-size: 1rem; caret-color: auto;">12h-12h30&nbsp;Helma Korzybska (S2
 HEP, Univ. Lyon 1, member LESC/CNRS, Univ. Paris Nanterre) Redefining “nois
 e”. Amplifications, modulations and redefinitions of auditory perception th
 rough cochlear implants</span></p><p>12h30-14h Lunch Break</p><h3>II. Theor
 ies and measures of amplification (2)</h3><p>14h-14h30&nbsp;Carola Lorea (P
 rofessor Univ. of Tübingen) On mantras, picnic parties and car horns: towar
 ds a South Asian sonic theory of amplification as auspiciousness</p><p>&nbs
 p;</p><p><strong>Conclusive remarks</strong></p><p><span lang="en-US">14h30
 -15h Pierre Prouteau (LAMC, EASt/ULB, CREM, CASE) What is an "amplified soc
 iety" ?</span></p><p>15h-16h Collective discussion and end of study day</p>
 <p>&nbsp;</p><h2>Abstracts</h2><p><strong>Abderraouf Ouertani (<span lang="
 en-US">member CUNTIC, Univ. of Tunis)</span> What amplification requires: T
 he impact of amplification on oud practices (and its study)</strong></p><p>
 This presentation will describe the impact of the widespread use of electri
 c amplification in the case of the oud, between constraints (sound degradat
 ion, feedback) and advantages (new sounds, going beyond the strict framewor
 k of chamber music). It will also be an opportunity to discuss the place of
  socio-technical phenomena related to electric amplification in music studi
 es and to problematise some key concepts in ethnomusicology such as ‘instru
 ment’, “music” and ‘musician’.</p><p><strong>Sarah Benhaim (Lecturer Univ. 
 of Lorraine) Extreme listening: sounds and amplification in noise music</st
 rong></p><p>Considering loud sound objects in the field of music invites us
  to take an interest in the technical means and technologies used to amplif
 y musical productions, but also in musical genres that place particular imp
 ortance on sound volume in their creative process and listening modalities.
  This is the case with noise music, an experimental music that emerged in t
 he early 1980s, which is unique in that it is characterised by noise-based 
 material and sound diffusion conditions that are often considered extreme. 
 I will examine how noise artists and listeners perceive noise and high-volu
 me amplification aesthetically and sensorially, based on interviews and rec
 ordings from a field study conducted in Paris. After a brief review of the 
 centrality of noise in noise music, I will explain how amplification consti
 tutes a noisy mediation from the point of view of instrumental performance,
  before showing how it plays a major role in live listening by promoting an
  immersive and ecstatic listening experience.</p><p><strong>Mukul Menon (pr
 edoc, Univ. Tübingen) Modulating Religiosity: Qualified Amplification of So
 unds, Ideas, and Practices</strong></p><p>Sound in the context of public, c
 ommunal, and private piety is linked to mediation with the more-than-human 
 and the inscription of identity, social relations, and associations with th
 e past. Amplification as a tool and a method of augmenting such processes i
 s especially evident in religious cultures that are based on what has been 
 termed ‘acoustic piety’, that is, religiosity significantly produced, inter
 preted, and perceived through sound and in sonic terms. What do differences
  in sonic and cultural amplification of religious practices in a hierarchic
 al and stratified social environment indicate about underlying social pheno
 mena? To explore this idea, this paper takes as a case study the popular pr
 actice of recitations of the 16th-century text, <em>Addhyātma</em> <em>Rāmā
 yaṇam</em> <em>Kiḷippāṭṭ,</em> a regional vernacular retelling of the relig
 ious epic <em>Rāmāyaṇa </em>in Kerala, South India. Using ethnographic and 
 archival data, it looks at how, through the amplification of recitational p
 ractices and ancillary activities- including onsite live and playback perfo
 rmances, congregational sonic acts, public sermons, and political speeches 
 in urban and rural contexts- particular communities, socialities, and space
 s are delineated. Modulations in how ideas and sounds are expanded indicate
  particularities of cultural transformations and continuities. which are ex
 pressed, shared, and felt, but also creatively deployed by social agents.</
 p><p><strong>Helma Korzybska (S2HEP, Univ. Lyon 1, member LESC/CNRS, Univ. 
 Paris Nanterre) Redefining “noise”. Amplifications, modulations and redefin
 itions of auditory perception through cochlear implants</strong></p><p>Intr
 oducing neurotechnologies into the bodies and perception of people who have
  lost the ability to hear raises numerous technical, cultural and ethical q
 uestions (Mills 2012, Friedner and Helmreich 2012, Lloyd &amp; Bonventre 20
 20, Bonventre et al. 2023, Kecman et al. 2026), nuancing widespread notions
  of human augmentation. The learning and rehabilitation process following t
 he surgical implantation is long and strenuous, leaving people with soundin
 g worlds they often find difficult to interpret and to incorporate. Not onl
 y do individuals have to deal with day-to-day technical issues and sensory 
 fluctuations, but they also must learn to manage the cultural gap with the 
 newfound perception.</p><p>Using cochlear implants requires different types
  of adjustments and negotiations, of sensory thresholds, somatic modes of a
 ttention, as well as expectations… If “augmenting” perception doesn’t usual
 ly translate in a meliorative sense, some kind of enhancement does operate 
 here. What kinds of amplifications or intensifications are produced or enab
 led through these stimulation devices? How are perception and experience am
 plified in this context?</p><p>The technological design and implantation an
 d rehabilitation protocols lead to very specific ways of heightening sensat
 ions and modes of attention. This communication proposes to offer insights 
 into the complexity of equipping perception with technological devices, by 
 focusing on the semantic, sensory, and affective redefinitions of “noise”, 
 as revealed through the electrode calibration process and negotiations betw
 een patients and speech therapists/audiologists observed in a cochlear impl
 antation service in France.</p><p><strong><span lang="en-US">Dr. Carola Lor
 ea (Professor Univ. of Tübingen) On mantras, picnic parties and car horns: 
 towards a South Asian sonic theory of amplification as auspiciousness</span
 ></strong></p><p><span lang="en-US">Based on extensive ethnographic researc
 h on mantras and sacred sound practices in India, this paper develops a pre
 liminary theory of amplification as auspiciousness. Drawing on sonic ethnog
 raphy, I approach amplification not primarily as a technical operation, but
  as a culturally and ritually charged modality of sharing auspiciousness in
  space. I first demonstrate how amplified sound is widely associated with s
 afety, joy, the assertion of presence, life energy, and positive force. Thr
 ough everyday and festive soundscapes—such as picnic-season loudspeaker cul
 tures and the affective sensorium of vehicular honking—I show how loudness 
 and sonic expansion are socially experienced as protective, enlivening, and
  affirming.</span></p><p><span lang="en-US">The paper then moves beyond str
 ictly audible sound to explore forms of non-electroacoustic amplification o
 f unheard auspicious sounds. Focusing in particular on spinning and other k
 inetic practices, I examine how motion itself amplifies mantras—understood 
 as sacred, efficacious formulas—by engaging agentive elements such as wind,
  fire, electricity, and the human voice. Here, amplification is not only a 
 matter of volume, but of circulation, repetition, and scattering into space
 , underscoring the inseparability of sound, movement, space, and felt vibra
 tion. By bringing together loudness, motion, and mantra practice, this pape
 r traces the contours of a broader South Asian sonic ideology in which ampl
 ification emerges as a central mode of producing auspiciousness and of maki
 ng place.</span></p>
DTSTAMP:20260531T121610
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260424T090000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260424T180000
SEQUENCE:0
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR